At a glance
- What the study gets you
- Access to the study treatment being tested
- Type of study
- Interventional (receives a drug or procedure)
- Time in hospital
- In-person visits at study sites — visit count not specified by the sponsor
- Drug or intervention
- Percuteneous Coronary Intervention (procedure), Optimal Medical Therapy (other)
- How long the study runs
- Study runs about 168 months (dates as stated)
- About the drug or intervention
- Percuteneous Coronary Intervention — procedure: PCI of Chronic Total Occlusions · Optimal Medical Therapy — other: Initiation and titration of optimal medical therapy in the control arm.
- Patient visit burden
- Not specified by the sponsor
In plain English
This trial, run by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, looks at adults with ischaemic heart disease and a long-term complete blockage of a heart artery (called a chronic total occlusion, or CTO). It compares an operation to open the blocked artery with the best medicine-based care. Everyone takes the best medicines for 3 months first, then people are split into groups: those without symptoms (Cohort A), those with symptoms (Cohort B), and those not suitable for the main groups (Cohort C).
Who can take part
- Adults aged 18 or over
- A long-term complete blockage in a heart artery
- Signs the heart muscle is not getting enough blood, shown by a nuclear scan
- The target artery is at least 2.5 mm wide
- Able to give written consent and willing to attend follow-up contacts
- After 3 months of best medicines: for Cohort A, no or mild symptoms with reduced blood flow affecting at least 10% of the left side of the heart; for Cohort B, symptoms with reduced blood flow affecting 5% of the left side of the heart
Who may not be able to
- A heart attack in the past month
- Heart arteries not suitable for a CTO procedure
- Disease of the left main artery or three vessels where bypass surgery is advised
- Life expectancy under 2 years
- Severe long-term lung disease
- Cannot take two blood-thinning medicines at once
- Pregnancy
- Poor kidney function
- Multi-vessel disease where treating the non-CTO narrowing first is unsafe
- Severe heart valve disease
What taking part involves
- • All patients take the best medicine-based care for 3 months before being placed in a group
- • Patients are then divided into groups: Cohort A (no symptoms), Cohort B (symptoms), or Cohort C (not eligible for the other groups)
- • The trial compares opening the blocked artery with the best medicine-based care — details of procedures are not stated — ask the trial team
Time commitment: At least 3 months of best medicines before grouping, plus follow-up contacts — exact number of visits and total trial length are not stated — ask the trial team.
Plain-English summary (AI-generated) from registry data. Not eligibility advice — only the trial team can confirm whether you can take part. Use the eligibility checker to see how your health profile matches this trial.
- Type of study
- Testing a treatment
- Ages
- 18 Years and over
- Who
- All
- Number of participants
- 1,560
- Started
- 2018-11-06
- Last checked
- 2025-12
Plain English Summary
What is this study?
- • Testing a new treatment for ischemic heart disease
- • NA - 1,560 participants
- • Study design Prospective randomized open labeled multicenter study Hypotheses 1
Who can take part?
- • Ages 18 Years and over
- • Diagnosed with ischemic heart disease
Where?
- • Belfast - Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Cardiology
- • Bristol - University Hospital Bristol
- • London - Barts Health NHS
- • London - St George's University Hospital
This is a simplified summary. Always discuss with your doctor before making any decisions.
About This Trial
Study design Prospective randomized open labeled multicenter study Hypotheses 1. In asymptomatic patients with ≥ 10% of myocardial ischemia: PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) with latest generation of drug eluting stents is superior to optimal medical therapy in terms of relative reduction in MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular events). 2. In symptomatic patients with ≥ 5% of myocardial ischemia: PCI with latest generation of drug eluting stents is superior to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in terms of improved life quality measured as an increase of SAQ (Self Assessment Questionnaire) score of 8 points after 6 months. Inclusion Criteria * CTO in native coronary artery * Myocardial ischemia in a territory supplied by CTO assessed by nuclear imaging. * Age ≥18 yrs. * Able to provide written Informed consent and willing to comply with the specified follow-up contacts * Target artery ≥ 2.5 mm Prior to randomization all patients undergo 3 months of OMT. Subsequently the population will be divided into: Cohort A: Asymptomatic (CCS \< 2 and SAQ QoL \> 60) patients with myocardial ischemia (≥ 10% of LV) in a territory supplied by CTO Cohort B: Symptomatic patients (CCS class ≥ 2 and/or SAQ QoL score ≤ 60 after treating non CTO lesions and after OMT) with Myocardial ischemia (5% of LV) in a territory supplied a CTO Cohort C: patients enrolled but not randomized in cohort A or B Exclusion criteria (for both cohort A and B) * NSTEMI or STEMI within 1 month * Coronary anatomy not suitable for CTO-procedure * Coronary artery disease involving the left main/three-vessel disease with indication for CABG following heart team conference * Life expectancy \< 2 years * Severe chronic pulmonary disease (FEV1 \< 30 % of predicted value) * Contraindication to dual anti-platelet therapy * Pregnancy * eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 * In multi-vessel disease: if it is deemed unsafe to treat the non-CTO lesion first. * Severe valvular heart disease Primary endpoint Cohort A: Composite endpoint of MACCE (all-cause mortality, stroke, any myocardial infarction, clinically driven revascularization\*), hospitalization for heart failure or incidence of malignant arrhythmias. \*CCS class ≥ 2 and/or QoL score \< 60. Same criteria used as for allocation to Cohort B Cohort B: SAQ Quality of Life Assessment after 6 months. Number of patients 1,560 (1200 in cohort A/360 in cohort B Follow up time Cohort A: 5 years Cohort B: 6 months
More detail
A chronic total occlusion (CTO) is observed in up to (1) 30 % of patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography. The presence of a CTO is associated with worse outcome compared to non-occlusive coronary artery disease. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) treatment of CTO lesions has gained much attention over the last decade due to introduction of new techniques and devices resulting in high success rates in dedicated centers. However the scientific evidence is mainly based on observational studies and expert consensus. The current European and American guidelines on revascularization does not provide any clear recommendations how to manage patients with CTO. The indication of treating a CTO lesion, or any other lesion with PCI for that matter, is either to relieve symptoms or improve prognosis. However, to date, there are no randomized clinical trials showing any prognostic benefit from CTO revascularization. Data from randomized clinical trials are also scarce regarding improvement of symptoms and Quality of life (QoL). In the recently presented DECISION-CTO study, patients were randomized to PCI vs. OMT, and the study failed to demonstrate a prognostic or symptomatic benefit of PCI vs. OMT. However, the study was prematurely terminated due to slow inclusion rate and had a high crossover rate and a high proportion did not have a quality of life score at follow-up. The fact that both the Decision CTO and the Euro CTO trial failed to include the pre-specified number of patients, makes it difficult to draw any conclusions on how to treat these patients. The preliminary results from both trials indicate that CTO PCI seems to be a safe procedure and might improve symptoms and QoL. In the randomized EXPLORE trial, patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)and a concomitant CTO in a non infarct related artery was investigated. This study showed no benefit in terms of improving left ventricular function due to CTO-PCI of the concomitant CTO, although the procedure was safe. Meta-analysis of observational studies comparing the prognosis after successful vs. unsuccessful CTO PCI indicate prognostic and symptomatic benefit of successful CTO PCI. However, these studies often lack data regarding ischemia burden and viability. The fact that the non-successful PCI patients consistently in these studies have higher risk profile, indicating the presence of residual confounders not accounted for in the multivariate statistical models, makes the interpretation of these data in a clinical setting difficult. The non-randomized FACTOR trial demonstrated a positive outcome for quality of life, but only in symptomatic patients. Data from the OPEN-CTO registry demonstrated an improvement of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire for quality of life by 10.8 points after a successful CTO-procedure. In addition to symptomatic improvement, a successful CTO procedure can reduce the amount of myocardium susceptible to ischemia in patients with at least mild to moderate ischemia at baseline and by that the prognosis can be improved (mortality, myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmias). Hence, the interventional management of CTO lesions must address whether it is indicated on symptomatic and/or prognostic basis. These questions have not been sufficiently addressed in the previous trials and we need evidence from randomized clinical trials on how to treat these patients. We therefore designed this randomized clinical trial addressing the impact of CTO PCI on outcome. Patients are included in 2 different patient cohorts depending on level of symptoms and level of myocardial ischemia. From previous studies, we know that it is most probably only patients with at least moderate myocardial ischemia who will benefit from CTO PCI in terms of improving MACCE, and only symptomatic patients who will benefit with regard to improvement of quality of life following CTO PCI. Before entering the study all patients will be subject to a 3-month period with titration of optimal medical therapy. Hereafter the patients will be eligible for inclusion in one of two cohorts based on level of ischemia and presence of symptoms: Cohort A: Comprise CTO patients who are asymptomatic (CCS class \<2 and SAQ QoL\> 60) but have moderate myocardial ischemia (\>10% of the left ventricle) on MR or rubidium-PET. These patients will be randomized to CTO PCI or OMT and followed up to 10 years. Cohort B: Comprise symptomatic CTO patients (CCS class ≥ 2 and/or SAQ QoL score ≤ 60) with at least 5% reversible ischemia. These patients will be randomized to CTO PCI or OMT. The patients randomized to OMT will be offered CTO PCI procedure 6 months after randomization following assessment of Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality of life score. Cohort C - Patients enrolled but not eligible for randomization All patients enrolled at baseline but who do not meet the criteria described in cohort A and B for randomization. Registry based follow-up (optional) is performed at the same time points as in Cohort A. This is the first randomized study that addresses improvement of prognosis and quality of life following PCI of CTO lesions specifically. The purpose of this study is twofold: 1. Investigate the outcome of PCI vs. optimal medical therapy of CTO lesions in patients with significant myocardial ischemia (≥ 10%) without symptoms 2. Investigate the outcome of PCI vs. optimal medical therapy of CTO lesions in patients with symptoms and mild to moderate myocardial ischemia (≥5%). Hypotheses 1. In asymptomatic patients with ≥ 10% of myocardial ischemia: PCI with latest generation of drug eluting stents is superior to optimal medical therapy in terms of outcome measured as 30% relative reduction in Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular events (MACCE). 2. In symptomatic patients with ≥ 5% of myocardial ischemia: PCI with latest generation of drug eluting stents is superior to optimal medical therapy in terms of improved life quality measured as an increase of SAQ score of 8 points after 6 months.
How this trial compares with your answers
Answer 2 more questions to improve match
What we know so far
Still need:
- • Tell us your age for better matching
- • Tell us your sex for better matching
Preliminary match based on your answers. Full eligibility requires on-site assessment including medical history, physical exam, and lab tests. This does not guarantee enrolment.
Eligibility at a Glance
Key info
- Age: 18 Years and over
- Who can join: All genders
Biomarkers mentioned
What the study is looking for
- ✓CTO in native coronary artery
- ✓Myocardial ischemia in a territory supplied by CTO assessed by nuclear imaging.
- ✓Age ≥18 yrs.
- ✓Able to provide written agreement to take part and willing to comply with the specified follow-up contacts.
- ✓Target artery ≥ 2.5 mm
Who cannot take part
- ✗NSTEMI or STEMI within 1 month
- ✗Coronary anatomy not suitable for CTO-procedure
- ✗Coronary disease involving the left main/three vessel disease with indication for CABG following heart team conference.
- ✗Life expectancy \< 2 years
- ✗Severe chronic lung disease (FEV1 \< 30 % of predicted value)
See the full criteria
Where Is This Study? (4 UK sites)
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Cardiology
Belfast BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
University Hospital Bristol
Bristol BS1 3NU, United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS
London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
St George's University Hospital
London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
How to Get in Touch
Evald Christiansen, MD PhD
Sponsor contactCONTACT
Emil N Holck, MD
Sponsor contactCONTACT
